Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amit Spitzer's avatar

The detail worth pulling out of the wiki story is that read only was never actually enforced, it was assumed. If a site's edit endpoint accepts a GET request the same way it accepts a page load, any client that can construct a URL can write to it, agent or not. That's not really an AI safety failure, it's an old web security anti-pattern, state changing actions living behind an idempotent request, that a scripted crawler would have hit just as easily years before agents existed. The real question whenever a vendor calls an integration read only is whether that's a permission the API actually enforces or just a description of what they expect callers to do with it.

No posts

Ready for more?